🎉 The #CandyDrop Futures Challenge is live — join now to share a 6 BTC prize pool!
📢 Post your futures trading experience on Gate Square with the event hashtag — $25 × 20 rewards are waiting!
🎁 $500 in futures trial vouchers up for grabs — 20 standout posts will win!
📅 Event Period: August 1, 2025, 15:00 – August 15, 2025, 19:00 (UTC+8)
👉 Event Link: https://www.gate.com/candy-drop/detail/BTC-98
Dare to trade. Dare to win.
Recently, there has been a heated discussion within the Curve ecosystem regarding the future development direction. Community member phil_00Llama proposed a striking proposal calling for a pause on all new Layer 2 (L2) development plans. This proposal immediately attracted widespread attention within the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) community.
phil_00Llama's perspective is based on several key factors: firstly, he points out that the maintenance costs of current Layer 2 solutions are comparable to those of the Ethereum mainnet, yet the returns are far less. Data shows that the total daily revenue of all Layer 2 chains is currently only about $1,500, a figure that seems disproportionate to the resources invested.
Secondly, he emphasized the characteristics of Layer 2 technology's rapid update and iteration speed, as well as its short lifecycle, which puts tremendous operational pressure on development teams. In the face of such a rapidly changing technological environment, the rationale for continuously investing large amounts of resources into Layer 2 development is called into question.
phil_00Llama suggested to retain the already deployed L2 projects, but shift the development team's focus to areas that may yield higher returns. This proposal has sparked deep reflection among community members, with some commenting that it is a 'very radical' idea that requires more detailed justification and discussion.
This debate highlights the challenges that DeFi projects face in terms of technical choices and resource allocation. As blockchain technology continues to evolve, finding a balance between innovation and stability has become a serious consideration for every project team.
The final decision of the Curve community on this proposal could have far-reaching implications for the development direction of the entire Decentralized Finance ecosystem. Regardless of the outcome, this discussion reflects the cryptocurrency community's cautious attitude towards the path of technological development and its spirit of continuous exploration.