The inflation issue of Polkadot has sparked heated discussions, with the community exploring nuclear time income distribution plans.

Recently, Filippo Franchini, a technology educator at the Web3 Foundation, posted on social media proposing to burn all the revenue from the Polkadot core time sale. This viewpoint has sparked widespread discussion within the community, with most members expressing agreement, but some believe that it is too early to draw conclusions.

Franchini believes that burning nuclear time revenue is the only way to classify it as "pure network revenue." He stated that even if the initial sales volume is not high, this practice will have a positive social impact, making DOT more attractive. In addition, due to the existence of the OpenGov mechanism, the community can adjust this policy when necessary.

In fact, as early as July, Jonas from the Web3 Foundation proposed on GitHub to burn the revenue from the nuclear time sale. He believes that doing so would help balance Inflation, provide clear incentives, and achieve collective value.

At the same time, Jonas also proposed adjustments to the current inflation model at the Polkadot forum. He pointed out that the current model could lead to treasury revenues decreasing to zero, suggesting that 20% of the annual inflation be directly allocated to the treasury, while the remaining 80% be adjusted according to the existing mechanism.

Community members have differing views on these proposals. Some believe that more data support is needed, while others have put forward alternative suggestions. Overall, most people think that more in-depth analysis and extensive community discussion are required before advancing any major changes.

The inflation issue of Polkadot involves multiple aspects, including Staking yield, treasury funds, and the development of ecological applications. Currently, the community generally believes that the inflation rate is too high, but there are still controversies about how to adjust it. Some argue that directly burning the core time income may not effectively solve the problem and that the inflation adjustment plan should be considered as a whole.

In the future, the Polkadot community needs to find the best solution that can control Inflation while promoting ecological development based on balancing the interests of all parties. This requires more data analysis, technical discussions, and community consensus. Regardless of the final solution adopted, actively participating in the governance process and contributing to the long-term development of DOT is the responsibility of every community member.