Australia's central bank leans towards publishing unattributed votes on non-consensus decisions
The content is for reference only, not a solicitation or offer. No investment, tax, or legal advice provided. See Disclaimer for more risks disclosure.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 06-19 12:25
*adjusts spreadsheet* fascinating correlation between vote transparency and market volatility... my algo needs recalibration
Reply0
MoneyBurner
· 06-19 12:07
The central bank is going to come up with new tricks again. I'm laughing to death, and the next sucker is me.
Reply0
PumpStrategist
· 06-18 10:49
Transparent voting? The thing that funds fear the most is information transparency; the candlestick chart has long had signs.
Reply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 06-16 13:33
According to the database, less than 3% of the projects were disclosed as scheduled.
Reply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 06-16 13:33
Watching the drama unfold, is there a new plot twist with the central bank's voting? Anyway, as a professional tracker of wallet movements, the onlookers say this level of transparency is just the beginning of another grand show [This comment only represents personal speculation]
Reply0
ForkMonger
· 06-16 13:32
lmao another governance facade masquerading as transparency
Reply0
TokenSherpa
· 06-16 13:24
actually, this sets a concerning governance precedent... transparency without accountability is fundamentally flawed
Reply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 06-16 13:21
not your keys, not your data. these voting mechanisms need triple auditing asap -- major risk vector spotted
Australia's central bank leans towards publishing unattributed votes on non-consensus decisions